Reading 37
MODULE 37.1: INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL RATIOS
Describe tools and techniques used in financial analysis, including their uses and limitations.
Tools: ratio analysis, common-size analysis, graphical analysis, regression.
Ratio Analysis
Ratios identify questions rather than answer them. Uses:
- Project future earnings and cash flow
- Evaluate flexibility (growth and meeting obligations under unexpected circumstances)
- Assess management performance
- Evaluate firm and industry changes over time
- Compare firm with industry competitors
Limitations:
- Not useful in isolation — need peer/historical comparison
- Different accounting treatments (esp. U.S. vs non-U.S.) make comparison harder
- Hard to find comparable industry ratios for multi-industry firms
- Conclusions cannot be made from a single ratio
- Determining target/comparison value requires judgment
Common-Size Analysis
Vertical: B/S items as % of total assets; I/S items as % of revenue. Useful for cost-margin trends.
Horizontal: each item as % of base-year value (Y1 = 1.0).
Graphical & Regression Analysis
Stacked column/bar graphs, line graphs visualize trends. Regression identifies relationships for forecasting (e.g., GDP → sales).
四種工具:比率/共同尺寸/圖表/回歸。比率用途:預測盈餘現金流、評估彈性、衡量管理、看時序變化、與同業比。限制:單獨無意義、跨國會計差、跨業難比、需綜合多比率、需判斷可接受範圍。
共同尺寸:垂直=B/S 各項/總資產、I/S 各項/營收;橫向=每項/基期。
圖表(堆疊長條/線圖)視覺化趨勢;回歸做預測(如 GDP→銷售)。
MODULE 37.2: FINANCIAL RATIOS, PART 1 — ACTIVITY & LIQUIDITY
Calculate and interpret activity, liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios.
Activity (Asset Utilization / Turnover) Ratios
\[\text{Receivables turnover} = \dfrac{\text{annual sales}}{\text{avg receivables}};\quad \text{DSO} = \dfrac{365}{\text{receivables turnover}}\]
\[\text{Inventory turnover} = \dfrac{\text{COGS}}{\text{avg inventory}};\quad \text{DOH} = \dfrac{365}{\text{inventory turnover}}\]
\[\text{Payables turnover} = \dfrac{\text{purchases (or COGS)}}{\text{avg trade payables}};\quad \text{Days of payables} = \dfrac{365}{\text{payables turnover}}\]
Purchases = ending inventory − beginning inventory + COGS.
\[\text{Total asset turnover} = \dfrac{\text{revenue}}{\text{avg total assets}}\]
\[\text{Fixed asset turnover} = \dfrac{\text{revenue}}{\text{avg net fixed assets}}\]
\[\text{Working capital turnover} = \dfrac{\text{revenue}}{\text{avg working capital}}\]
For inventory turnover, use COGS in the numerator, not sales.
Use averages when comparing B/S items to I/S items (begin + end)/2. For seasonal industries, more data points within the year are better.
High receivables turnover → either excellent collections or overly strict credit (look at revenue growth vs peers). High inventory turnover → either efficient or stock-outs (compare growth). Low payables turnover → either cash flow problems or favorable supplier terms.
Liquidity Ratios
\[\text{Current ratio} = \dfrac{\text{current assets}}{\text{current liabilities}}\]
\[\text{Quick (acid-test) ratio} = \dfrac{\text{cash + marketable securities + receivables}}{\text{current liabilities}}\]
\[\text{Cash ratio} = \dfrac{\text{cash + marketable securities}}{\text{current liabilities}}\]
\[\text{Defensive interval} = \dfrac{\text{cash + marketable securities + receivables}}{\text{average daily expenditures}}\]
Days the firm could pay current cash expenditures (COGS, SG&A, R&D — exclude noncash like depreciation).
\[\text{Cash conversion cycle} = \text{DSO} + \text{DOH} - \text{Days of payables}\]
Lower CCC is generally better. Firms that collect from customers before paying suppliers can run with current ratio < 1.
活動比率(周轉率):
- 應收周轉=銷售/平均應收;DSO=365/應收周轉。
- 存貨周轉=COGS/平均存貨;DOH=365/存貨周轉。
- 應付周轉=採購(或 COGS)/平均應付;Days payable=365/應付周轉。採購=期末存貨−期初存貨+COGS。
- 總資產周轉=營收/平均總資產;固定資產周轉=營收/平均淨固定資產;工作資本周轉=營收/平均工作資本。
對比 B/S 與 I/S 用「平均」;高周轉可能效率高也可能存貨不足/信用太嚴;低應付周轉可能現金緊或供應商給好條件。
流動性比率:流動/速動/現金比;防禦期=(現金+市場證券+應收)/日均支出(排除非現金);現金循環週期 CCC = DSO + DOH − 應付天數,越低越好。
MODULE 37.3: FINANCIAL RATIOS, PART 2 — SOLVENCY & PROFITABILITY
Solvency and profitability ratios.
Solvency Ratios
\[\text{D/E} = \dfrac{\text{total debt}}{\text{total equity}};\quad \text{Debt-to-capital} = \dfrac{\text{total debt}}{\text{total debt + total equity}};\quad \text{Debt-to-assets} = \dfrac{\text{total debt}}{\text{total assets}}\]
\[\text{Financial leverage} = \dfrac{\text{avg total assets}}{\text{avg total equity}}\]
For exam: include all interest-bearing liabilities in total debt. Per Level I curriculum, exclude leases from total debt despite their interest-bearing nature (no explanation given) — be aware this makes leverage look low for lease-heavy industries (airlines).
\[\text{Interest coverage} = \dfrac{\text{EBIT}}{\text{interest}};\quad \text{Debt-to-EBITDA} = \dfrac{\text{total debt}}{\text{EBITDA}}\]
\[\text{Fixed charge coverage} = \dfrac{\text{EBIT + lease payments}}{\text{interest + lease payments}}\]
Lease-heavy companies benefit from the fixed-charge measure. Also useful for U.S. GAAP firms with operating leases (no interest recorded in I/S).
Profitability Ratios
\[\text{Gross profit margin} = \dfrac{\text{gross profit}}{\text{revenue}};\quad \text{Operating margin} = \dfrac{\text{operating income}}{\text{revenue}};\quad \text{Pretax margin} = \dfrac{\text{EBT}}{\text{revenue}};\quad \text{Net profit margin} = \dfrac{\text{NI}}{\text{revenue}}\]
\[\text{ROA} = \dfrac{\text{NI}}{\text{avg total assets}};\quad \text{ROA (adjusted)} = \dfrac{\text{NI + interest}\times(1-t)}{\text{avg total assets}}\]
\[\text{Operating ROA} = \dfrac{\text{EBIT or operating income}}{\text{avg total assets}}\]
\[\text{ROIC} = \dfrac{\text{after-tax operating profit}}{\text{avg long-term capital}}\]
\[\text{ROE} = \dfrac{\text{NI}}{\text{avg total equity}};\quad \text{Return on common equity} = \dfrac{\text{NI − preferred div}}{\text{avg common equity}}\]
Cash 105/95, A/R 205/195, Inv 310/290, CA 620/580. Gross PP&E 1,800/1,700, Accum dep 360/340 → Net PP&E 1,440/1,360. Total assets 2,060/1,940.
A/P 110/90, ST debt 160/140, Current LT debt 55/45, CL 325/275; LT debt 610/690; DTL 105/95. Common stock 300/300 + APIC 400/400 + RE 320/180 = equity 1,020/880.
I/S: Sales 4,000; COGS 3,000; OpEx 650; Op profit 350; Interest 50; EBT 300; Tax 100; NI 200; Common div 60.
Current ratio = 620/325 = 1.9.
Total asset turnover = 4,000 / ((2,060+1,940)/2) = 4,000/2,000 = 2.0.
Net profit margin = 200/4,000 = 5.0%.
Return on common equity = 200 / ((1,020+880)/2) = 200/950 = 21.1%.
Total debt = ST debt 160 + Current LT debt 55 + LT debt 610 = 825. D/E = 825/1,020 = 80.9%.
償債:D/E、債/資本、債/資產、財務槓桿(資產/權益);利息覆蓋=EBIT/利息、Debt/EBITDA、固定費用覆蓋(含租賃)。L1 規定總債務排除租賃。
獲利:毛利率/營業利益率/稅前利益率/淨利率;ROA(含調整版)、營業 ROA、ROIC、ROE、普通股權益報酬率(扣特股息)。
例 Sedgwick:流動比 1.9;資產周轉 2.0;淨利率 5.0%;普通股 ROE 21.1%;D/E 80.9%。
Describe relationships among ratios and evaluate a company using ratio analysis.
20X6→X7→X8: current ratio 1.2 → 1.5 → 2.0; quick ratio 1.0 → 0.8 → 0.5; days of inventory 30→50→60; DSO 40→30→20.
Current ratio ↑ but quick ratio ↓ → inventory drove the current-ratio increase (DOH up confirms). DSO declining → accelerated collections, perhaps to offset cash drain from poor inventory management.
| Current | Previous | Industry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Total asset turnover | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Net profit margin | 5.0% | 5.8% | 6.5% |
| ROE (common) | 21.1% | 24.1% | 19.8% |
| D/E | 80.9% | 99.4% | 35.7% |
Liquidity above industry. Turnover and margins below industry. ROE above industry — driven by higher leverage (D/E > 2× industry). Company is deleveraging.
分析應綜合多個比率。例 1:流動比升、速動比降+DOH 升=存貨堆積;DSO 降=加速收款補現金。
例 2 Sedgwick:流動性高於同業,但周轉與毛利低、ROE 高於同業=高槓桿撐起。D/E 從 99.4 降到 80.9% → 持續去槓桿。
- A. assets.
- B. sales.
- C. net income.
- A. Data on comparable firms are difficult to acquire.
- B. Determining the target or comparison value requires judgment.
- C. Different accounting treatments require analyst adjustments.
- A. 37 days.
- B. 44 days.
- C. 52 days.
- A. 2.00 / 7.00.
- B. 7.00 / 2.00.
- C. 0.33 / 0.50.
- A. 2.1 / 174.
- B. 3.3 / 111.
- C. 4.0 / 91.
- A. numerator falls more (lower CR).
- B. denominator falls more (higher CR).
- C. proportional (unchanged).
- A. numerator falls more (lower quick ratio).
- B. denominator falls more (higher quick ratio).
- C. proportional (unchanged).
- A. A/R collected to cash.
- B. Fixed assets purchased with cash.
- C. A/P paid with cash.
- A. 69 days.
- B. 104 days.
- C. 150 days.
- A. return on total capital.
- B. defensive interval ratio.
- C. fixed charge coverage ratio.
- A. 2.
- B. 3.
- C. 4.
MODULE 37.4: DUPONT ANALYSIS
Demonstrate the application of DuPont analysis of return on equity and calculate and interpret effects of changes in its components.
2-stage:
\[\text{ROE} = \text{ROA} \times \text{Financial Leverage}\]
3-stage (original DuPont):
\[\text{ROE} = \dfrac{\text{NI}}{\text{Sales}} \times \dfrac{\text{Sales}}{\text{Avg assets}} \times \dfrac{\text{Avg assets}}{\text{Avg equity}}\]
= net profit margin × total asset turnover × financial leverage (equity multiplier).
Low ROE → at least one of: low margin, low turnover, low leverage.
5-stage (extended DuPont):
\[\text{ROE} = \dfrac{\text{NI}}{\text{EBT}} \times \dfrac{\text{EBT}}{\text{EBIT}} \times \dfrac{\text{EBIT}}{\text{Sales}} \times \dfrac{\text{Sales}}{\text{Avg assets}} \times \dfrac{\text{Avg assets}}{\text{Avg equity}}\]
= tax burden × interest burden × EBIT margin × asset turnover × leverage.
Tax burden = NI/EBT = (1 − tax rate). Interest burden = EBT/EBIT (lower = higher interest burden). More leverage adds interest cost — leverage helps but interest burden offsets.
ROE: 20X3 18.1% (7.0% × 1.33 × 1.93); 20X4 18.0% (6.4% × 1.21 × 2.34); 20X5 17.4% (5.3% × 1.17 × 2.78). Both margin and turnover declined; leverage increased to offset. Company is now riskier.
Co A: ROE 13.3%; Co B: ROE 24.0%. Co B has higher EBIT margin (11.1% vs 7.0%), higher asset turnover (3.0 vs 2.0), higher interest burden ratio (1.0 vs 0.857 — i.e., A has more interest), and lower leverage (1.2 vs 1.67). B achieves higher ROE with less leverage — better operating efficiency.
DuPont 拆解:
2 段:ROE = ROA × 槓桿。
3 段(原始):ROE = 淨利率 × 資產周轉 × 槓桿。
5 段(擴展):ROE = 稅負擔(NI/EBT)× 利息負擔(EBT/EBIT)× EBIT 利潤率 × 資產周轉 × 槓桿。
稅負擔=(1−t);利息負擔比率越低代表利息壓力越大。槓桿增加利息也增加,效益可被抵銷。
例 Staret:ROE 從 18.1→17.4%,雖然淨利率與周轉都降,槓桿從 1.93 升到 2.78 撐住——但風險增。
例 A vs B:B 的 EBIT 利潤率高、周轉快、利息負擔輕、槓桿低 → ROE 24% 遠勝 A 的 13.3%。
MODULE 37.5: INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC RATIOS & FORECASTING
Describe the uses of industry-specific ratios used in financial analysis.
- Services/consulting: Net income per employee, sales per employee.
- Retail/restaurants: Same-store sales growth (organic vs new locations), sales per square foot.
- Hotels: Average daily rate (ADR = room revenue / rooms sold), occupancy rate.
- Subscription services: Average revenue per user (ARPU).
Financial institutions face regulation:
- Capital adequacy — risk vs equity capital. Value at risk (VaR) estimates loss exceeded only X% of the time.
- Reserve requirements / liquid asset requirements for banks.
- Net interest margin = interest income / interest-earning assets (key for lenders).
Business Risk (Coefficient of Variation)
\[\text{CV} = \dfrac{\text{standard deviation}}{\text{mean}}\]
Applied to sales, operating income, net income — a size-adjusted measure of variability. Lower CV = lower business risk.
不同產業關鍵指標不同:顧問業(人均淨利/營收)、零售與餐飲(同店銷售成長、每坪營收)、旅館(ADR、入住率)、訂閱服務(ARPU)。
金融機構受監管:資本適足=風險/權益、VaR=指定機率下的最大損失;銀行還有準備金與流動資產要求;放款業看淨利息邊際 NIM=利息收入/生息資產。
業務風險=變異係數 CV=標準差/均值(size-adjusted),越低風險越小。
Describe how ratio analysis and other techniques can be used to model and forecast earnings.
Process: forecast sales → apply common-size ratios or expected margins to forecast each line item → produce pro forma I/S.
Three methods to explore variability around point estimates:
- Sensitivity analysis — "what if" on one variable at a time.
- Scenario analysis — specific bundled scenarios.
- Simulation — probability distributions for key variables, computer-generated outcomes.
建模:先預測營收 → 以共同尺寸比率或預期利潤率推算各項 → 編製 pro forma I/S。三種方法:敏感性分析(單變數 what-if)、情境分析(一組綁定變數)、模擬(蒙地卡羅)。
- A. (net profit margin)(interest component)(solvency ratio).
- B. (net profit margin)(total asset turnover)(tax retention rate).
- C. (net profit margin)(total asset turnover)(financial leverage multiplier).
- A. (net profit margin)(equity turnover).
- B. (net profit margin)(total asset turnover)(assets/equity).
- C. (ROA)(interest burden)(tax retention rate).
- A. CV for an income statement measure represents variation per monetary unit.
- B. CV is calculated by dividing a mean value by its standard deviation.
- C. CV is a size-adjusted measure of variation.
- A. assume key financial ratios will remain unchanged.
- B. use common-size statements to estimate expenses as % of net income.
- C. examine variability via sensitivity / scenario analysis.
Tools: ratios, common-size (vertical = % of total assets or sales; horizontal = % of base year), graphs, regression. Limitations: isolation, accounting differences, multi-industry comparability, judgment needed.
Activity: receivables/inventory/payables turnover, DSO/DOH/days payable, total/fixed/WC asset turnover.
Liquidity: current, quick, cash, defensive interval, CCC = DSO + DOH − days payable.
Solvency: D/E, debt-to-capital, debt-to-assets, leverage, interest coverage, debt/EBITDA, fixed-charge coverage.
Profitability: gross/operating/pretax/net margins, ROA, operating ROA, ROIC, ROE, return on common equity.
Combine ratios — ROE increase from added leverage tells a different story than ROE from operating improvement.
2-stage: ROE = ROA × leverage.
3-stage: ROE = net margin × asset turnover × leverage.
5-stage: ROE = tax burden × interest burden × EBIT margin × asset turnover × leverage.
Industry-specific ratios: same-store sales, ADR/occupancy, ARPU, NIM, VaR/capital adequacy.
Pro forma statements use ratio assumptions on a sales forecast. Sensitivity / scenario / simulation analysis explore variability.
37.a:工具=比率/共同尺寸/圖/回歸。37.b:活動/流動/償債/獲利四大類比率。37.c:多比率綜合解讀。37.d:DuPont 2/3/5 段。37.e:產業特定指標+金融機構+CV。37.f:建模+三種變異分析法。